I. Conclusion

1. Vision
   1. Vision actively seeks information and organizes the input to make sense of it
      1. Incomplete information is formed into a coherent pattern
      2. Pattern perceived is simplest and most stable interpretation
      3. It might not be accurate
   2. The visual system adjusts to current situation
      1. allows us to operate over larger range of conditions
      2. may obscure changes in imaging system that are important
   3. Restricted field of view limits ability for deciphering ambiguous stimuli
      1. Limits contextual stimuli
      2. Limits range of motion that can be used to disambiguate stimuli
2. Devices
   1. Develop standards for calibration
      1. Get imaging system into standard setting ready to use
   2. Develop standard procedures for use
      1. Get environment into standard conditions

Website: http://psych.hanover.edu/Presentations/VoiceFound/

References

    Agostini, T., & Bruno, N. (1996). Lightness contrast in CRT and paperand-illuminant displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 250-258.

    Brainard, D. (1997). Tips psychophysics bibliography [WWW Document]. URL: http://color.psych.ucsb.edu/brainard/software/bib.html.

    Bridgeman, B. (1998). Durations of stimuli displayed on video display terminals: (n - 1)/ f + persistence. Psychological Science, 9, 232-233.

    Cook, J. N., Sample, P. A., & Weinreb, R. N. (1993). Solution to spatial inhomogeneity on video monitors. Color Research & Applications, 18, 334-340.

    Hu, Q. J., & Klein, S. A. (1994). A two-dimensional lookup table to correct the spatial nonlinearity on CRT displays. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 25, 19-22.

    Infante, C. (1985). On the resolution of raster-scanned CRT displays.  Proceedings of the SID, 26, 23-36.

    Ittelson, W. H. (1952).  The Ames demonstrations in perception: a guide to their construction and use.  Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Krantz, J. H. (2001).  Stimulus delivery on the web: What can be presented when calibration isn't possible.  In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp.113-130).  Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers. 

    Krantz, J. H. (2000).  Tell me, what did you see?  The stimulus on computers.  Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 221-229.

    Krantz, J. H., & Silverstein, L. D. (1989). The gray-scale asymptote for anti-aliasing graphic images on color matrix displays. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 20, 139-141.

    Krantz, J. H., Silverstein, L. D., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (1992). Visibility of transmissive liquid crystal displays under dynamic lighting conditions. Human Factors, 34, 615-632.

    Kolb, H., Fernandez, E., & Nelson R. (2005). Webvision: The organization of the Retina and Visual System [WWW Document].  URL: http://webvision.med.utah.edu/. 

    Lyons, N. P., & Farrell, J. E. (1989). Linear systems analysis of CRT displays. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 20, 220-223.

    Metha, A. B., Vingrys, A. J., & Badcock, D. R. (1993). Calibration of a color monitor for visual psychophysics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 371-383.

    Neri, D. F. (1990). Color CRT characterization solely in terms of the CIE system. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 71, 51-64.

    Olds, E. S., Cowan, W. B., & Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Effective color CRT calibration techniques for perception research. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 16, 1501-1505.

    Pelli, D. G. (1997). Pixel independence: Measuring spatial interactions on a CRT Display. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.

    Rogowitz, B. E. (1988). The psychophysics of spatial sampling. In G.W. Hu, P. E. Mantley, & B. E. Rogowitz (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE, 901, 130-138.

    Silverstein, L. M., & Merrifield, R. M. (1985). The development and evaluation of color systems for airborne applications (DOT/FAA Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/PM-85-19). Washington, DC: DOT/FAA.